7.
What is in financial statements?

An introduction to accounting fundamentals

Unit learning outcomes

By the end of this unit, you will be able to:

  • explain the purpose of financial statements and their role in ensuring organisational accountability
  • show an awareness of the underlying concepts involved in the creation of financial statements
  • identify the basic components and purposes of the core financial statements: the income statement (IS), and the statement of financial position (SoFP).

7.1 Introduction

As an organisation grows, its accountability to others increases, driving the need for accurate information to be supplied to external interested parties about the organisation’s financial position, performance and cash flows. Financial statements serve as a tool to communicate this key financial information, enabling interested parties to make decisions about their engagement with the organisation.

The statement of cash flows is another important statement within financial accounts. This is covered in Unit 10.

Two of the main statements are the Statement of Financial Position (SoFP) and the Income Statement (IS). Fundamental to these statements are the five elements:

  • assets
  • liabilities
  • equity
  • income
  • expenses.

Throughout this unit we will explain the accounting principles that underpin financial reporting and will help you to prepare, use and think critically about financial statements.

This unit refers to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) terminology of the Statement of Financial Position and the Income Statement. However, these statements can have other titles. For example:

  • The Statement of Financial Position (SoFP) can also be called the balance sheet.
  • The Income Statement (IS) can also be called the statement of profit and loss or the profit and loss account.

7.2 What are the aims of financial statements?

Financial statements tell part of an organisation’s story, explaining its financial activities as an entity separate from its owners (the business entity concept) over a specified period of time (the accounting period). Financial statements ensure that those who manage the organisation are held accountable for their decisions.

They are designed to provide useful information. The two characteristics of useful information are:

  1. Faithful representation: Is this information sufficiently complete, neutral and error-free to meet an interested party’s need for data?
  2. Relevance: Can this information influence users’ decisions?

An organisation’s management is often required to state that the financial statements are ‘true and fair’. This means that they are a faithful representation of what happened during an accounting period and the financial position of the reporting entity at the end of the accounting period and are free from any deliberate misrepresentations or omissions. The information presented should, as a result, be an honest view of the company’s financial performance and condition. In addition, the financial statements should be presented in a way that is unbiased and understandable to a reasonably informed third party. This implies that the information is presented without any undue emphasis on positive aspects or downplaying of negative ones. Thus, they are prepared in an objective manner given the choices, judgements and estimates involved. In the case of most larger reporting entities, in most jurisdictions, there is a requirement that an auditor confirm that these conditions are met. They do so by stating that the financial statements present a ‘true and fair’ view of the affairs of the reporting entity.

Pause to reflect

  • Are these standards for financial reporting too high? Financial statements aim both to faithfully represent the organisation and be relevant, but often this involves trade-offs between the two. Which of these two is more important?
  • Financial statements are also ‘general purpose’, which means that one set of financial statements are produced for all users. Despite this, users have very different needs. What, for example, would be relevant inclusions in financial statements for employees? How could this be faithfully represented?
  • Is one set of financial statements sufficient to meet the needs of all parties with an interest in the reporting entity?

Enhancing characteristics

The fundamental and supporting qualitative characteristics of financial accounting are outlined in more detail in Unit 3.

Financial statements are designed to meet the following four enhancing characteristics:

  • Comparable: The information provided should allow a user to evaluate performance across different organisations in the same time period and for the same organisation over successive time periods, knowing that they have been prepared on a comparable basis. This basis usually requires adherence to either the financial reporting standards issued by the IFRS or country-specific generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP).
  • Verifiable: The information included in the financial statements should be traceable back to source documentation or other evidence by a third party (for example, an auditor).
  • Timely: The information supplied should be sufficiently recent to be useful for interested parties.
  • Understandable: Financial statements should be comprehensible to reasonably informed interested parties, making use of language and terms that are clearly explained.

Pause to reflect

Look at some accounts.

Download an annual report that contains a set of financial statements from the website of an organisation you are interested in. Do you think the information in them is comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable?

  • Comparable: Have any accounting policies changed? Changes in accounting policies can often be found in the note called the basis of preparation.
  • Verifiable. Look at the auditor’s report. What did the auditors do to confirm the numbers? Is this enough for you to rely on them? Do you know who the auditors are? Why should you trust them?
  • Timely. Check the date of the audit report. How long after the year end was it? Is this quick enough to support a decision you might want to make?
  • Understandable. How many pages are there for each report? Does the narrative tell a comprehensive story of the organisation’s activities?

You can read more prudence and the IASB’s conceptual framework in Pelger (2020).

Historically, financial statements were expected to be prudent. Prudence promoted the use of judgements that prevented the inflation of profits and assets, ensuring the transparency of liabilities, and fostering user confidence by making conservative estimates. When faced with uncertainty, accountants were encouraged to take a conservative approach, acknowledging potential losses and liabilities that might arise in the future and ensuring the organisation’s health is not presented in an overly optimistic light. The 2018 Conceptual Framework considered this to be an exercise that supports neutrality (in other words, faithful representation). The Financial Accounting Standards Board, the US standard-setter, has removed references to prudence as it creates inconsistencies when determining whether assets, income, expenses and liabilities should be recorded in financial statements.

Financial statement contents

The core statements usually include:

  • A statement of financial position (SoFP), which shows assets, liabilities and equity on the last day of the accounting period (usually a year). This is also known as a balance sheet.
  • An income statement (IS) (or for charities, a statement of financial activities) shows the income and expenses over the accounting period. This is also known as a statement of profit or loss.
  • A statement of cash flows showing the cash inflows and outflows over the accounting period. This is only required in the case of larger reporting entities.
  • A statement of changes in equity showing how an organisation’s equity has changed over the period due to profits, losses, dividends, and other equity-related transactions.
  • Accompanying notes of disclosures to further explain the balances presented.

Profitability is reported in the income statement, but it is important to note that profit (or a surplus in charity accounting) does not necessarily equate to having more cash available. Profit tells only part of the story. The story of cash is shown in the statement of cash flows, highlighting different categories of cash coming into and out of the organisation. Recognising the difference between cash and profit is essential in understanding the accruals principle.

Accruals principle

The accruals principle is fundamental to financial reporting. Under this principle, trading income is recognised when it is earned, and expenditure when it is incurred, regardless of when cash receipts (incoming) and cash payments (outgoing) occur. Recognising income and expenditure (and therefore profit) in this way can be difficult to measure as it involves numerous judgements and estimations. For example, when a contract is partially complete at a period end date, judgement must be made as to how much revenue has been earned to that point of time.

It is important to note that the accruals principle applies to routine trading transactions. It can be suspended to allow for non-trading adjustments to accounts such as the revaluation of the assets that it owns.

Pause to reflect

Refer to the financial statements of another organisation in which you are interested. Watch this explainer video on the nature of financial statements from IFAC (International Federation of Accountants) and match the statements described in the video to the statements you see in your chosen financial statements.

Cash vs profit questions

The difference between cash and profit is fundamental to understanding financial statements. Profit can be recognised without cash having been transferred. That is because profit is made by transferring property rights. For example, a sale can be made on credit terms, meaning a trade receivable asset is created as a result. Only later on might this turn into cash. Cash is affected by items being paid and money coming in or out of the bank account. Profit is affected by making a sale (transferring risks and rewards) and the expenses relating to the sale or to the accounting period. With this in mind, categorise each transaction below to show if you think it affects cash or profit, both or neither.

Question 7.1

I sold 20 books bought for £10 each, for £200 cash. Which of the following does this affect?

  • cash
  • profit
  • cash and profit
  • neither cash nor profit
  • It does affect cash as cash has been received, but it will also affect the profit as items have been sold and so income will be recognised, which is an element of profit.
  • It does affect profit, as income will be recognised, but cash has been received as well so cash will be affected.
  • Correct. Cash has been received and income, which is part of profit, should be recognised for the sale.
  • Both cash and profit will be affected by this cash has been received and income, which is part of profit, should be recognised for the sale.

Question 7.2

I took out a loan of £20,000. Which of the following does this affect?

  • cash
  • profit
  • cash and profit
  • neither cash nor profit
  • Correct, cash will be affected as cash will be received into the organisation. In the future if interest needs to be paid on the loan this will affect the profit as it will be an expense, but at this point the loan only affects cash.
  • No, profit is not affected. In the future if interest needs to be paid on the loan this will affect the profit as it will be an expense, but at this point the loan only affects cash.
  • Cash is correct but profit is not affected. In the future if interest needs to be paid on the loan this will affect the profit as it will be an expense, but at this point the loan only affects cash.
  • No, cash will be affected as cash will be received into the organisation.

Question 7.3

Knowing that I need to pay interest of £1,000 per year, which of the following does this affect?

  • cash
  • profit
  • cash and profit
  • neither cash nor profit
  • No cash transfers have happened and so cash will not be affected.
  • Correct. The profit will be affected but not cash as no cash has been transferred yet.
  • Yes, it will affect profit but not cash as no cash has been transferred.
  • No, it will affect profit as it must be recognised as an expense but it is correct that it will not affect cash as no cash has been transferred.

Question 7.4

I paid over interest to the bank of £1,000, which has already been accounted for as an expense. Which of the following does this affect?

  • cash
  • profit
  • cash and profit
  • neither cash nor profits
  • Correct. Cash will be affected but not profit as the expense has ‘already been accounted for’, which means that profit has already been adjusted when it was accounted for.
  • Profit is not affected as the expense has ‘already been accounted for’, which means that profit has already been adjusted when it was accounted for.
  • Cash is correct but not profit as the expense has ‘already been accounted for’, which means that profit has already been adjusted when it was accounted for.
  • It is correct that it will not affect profit as it has ‘already been accounted for’ but it will affect cash as cash is ‘being paid over’.

Shift to valuation basis

Unit 6 outlines the IFRS approach to accounting valuation in more detail.

Accrual accounting emphasises the recognition of revenues and expenses when they are earned or incurred, known as historical cost. However, another way of measuring income focuses on the current fair market value of assets and liabilities. This is known as the valuation basis. This approach has been adopted by IFRS and often exists alongside an accruals approach in local GAAP, accounting resulting in considerable confusion.

7.3 The financial statements

Throughout this unit, we will refer to Rozim Fashion Limited’s (Rozim’s) simplified financial statements. Rozim is a clothing manufacturer based in the United Kingdom which has been trading for over 10 years with a dedication to sustainable resourcing of materials. Some background and the simplified financial statements can be downloaded here.

The statement of financial position

The statement of financial position (SoFP), also known as the balance sheet, is a snapshot in time on the period end date.

The SoFP presents the financial position by measuring assets, liabilities and equity on the last day of the accounting period. It is a snapshot in time on this final day of the period.

Assets, liabilities and equity are the first three building blocks of the SoFP. In the SoFP, assets, liabilities and equity are connected as follows:

ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY

Pause to reflect

Review Rozim’s SoFP, and note down the total assets, liabilities and equity to confirm that the accounting equation above holds true.

Assets

A broad, universal definition of an asset is something that has value.

Pause to reflect

  • Look around you. What assets do you see? Perhaps a computer, a mobile phone, a drink, a building? You may see some cash, or more likely know there is money sitting in an app on your phone? Does your friend next to you owe you money? You may be feeling particularly knowledgeable today. Are all these examples of assets?
  • Consider who owns these assets. If it does have a value, then who does this value belong to?

A formal definition is as follows:

A resource controlled by the entity as a result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.1

Even with the formal definition, it is not always easy to determine if an asset can be recognised or reliably measured.

For example, you have numerous public rights – walking through the park, driving on roads or pursuing legal action against wrongdoers. These universal entitlements are valuable but provide no specific advantages for a single organisation in particular. Consequently, such public assets are disregarded in financial reporting, even in the case that they benefit a business financially.

An important consideration is, therefore, whether the organisation has control over the asset. If the organisation has the authority to make decisions regarding the asset and expects future benefits to flow to them, then they can recognise the asset on their statement of financial position (SoFP). The final consideration is that the asset needs to be able to be reliably measured. If it cannot, then it must not be recognised as an asset.

Three tick boxes are shown for the three criteria: Controlled by entity, Entity benefits from this control, and Value of asset can be reliably measured.

Figure 7.1 Checklist for recognising an asset on the SoFP.

For example, the SoFP of Next plc can include an asset for the brand Joules which they bought in December 2023. They control the brand, expect to get future benefits from it, and the brand can be faithfully represented as it has been bought. Next plc cannot, however, include the brand name of ‘Next’ on its SoFP as while it is controlled and Next plc will benefit from the brand, it cannot be faithfully represented because it was not separately bought, it has been internally generated.

Pause to reflect

  • An organisation cannot recognise an asset on its SoFP if it cannot be reliably measured.
  • Is your education considered an asset? Or your cognitive abilities? Can these be easily measured? Should an organisation’s workforce be included as an asset? How would you measure it? Can you identify any other assets that are particularly challenging to measure?

Review the definitions of the different current assets (for example, inventories, trade receivables, prepayments) in this guidance.

Organisations have various types of assets, including those expected to be converted into economic benefits (usually cash) within one year. These are called current assets. Examples of current assets include cash, inventories, trade receivables and prepayments.

Other assets are expected to be used in the organisation on a long-term basis, converted to cash after one year. These are classified as non-current assets. Examples of non-current assets include buildings, vehicles, patents, software and equipment. Non-current assets are further split into tangible non-current assets (which are physical and can be touched) and intangible non-current assets (which cannot be touched).

Pause to reflect

Look at Rozim’s SoFP to find out what assets they hold, noticing the types of assets that fall in the categories of current, non-current, tangible and intangible.

The accounting equation

The rest of the SoFP explains how these assets are funded. Whether a sole trader, partnership or incorporated company (like Rozim), the organisation is separate to the owners. The financial statements are always presented from the perspective of the organisation as separate from these owners.

Assume Rozim starts with £2,000. Where did this come from? When a company is formed, this initial funding usually comes from the owner and is called equity. Rozim has £2,000 cash (asset) and a £2,000 obligation to its owners (equity) which can be shown as follows:

ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY
Cash ▲ 2,000 Share capital ▲ 2,000

Rozim then borrows £500,000 cash. This funding has come from lenders and can be shown as a liability as follows:

ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY
Cash ▲ 2,000 Share capital ▲ 2,000
Cash ▲ 500,000 Bank loan ▲ 500,000

Liabilities

The term ‘liability’ is used to describe an obligation or duty to pay or perform, which can be settled by handing over an asset (most commonly cash). The formal definition is:

A present obligation of the entity arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.2

Review the definitions of the different liabilities (for example, trade payables, accruals, provisions) in this guidance.

Liabilities, just like assets, are categorised into current and non-current. Current liabilities are expected to be settled within a year and non-current liabilities after a year. Example liabilities include loans, overdrafts, trade payables, accruals and provisions.

Pause to reflect

Look at Rozim’s statements and investigate their liabilities, noticing the split between current and non-current. Read Notes 8 and 9, which give further information about the items included in these categories.

Equity

For a sole trader or partnership, the obligation to owner(s) can be referred to as capital. For limited companies, such as Rozim, we use the term equity.

Equity is the shareholder contribution to the entity. They are the funds entrusted to the management of the business to support its activities. Equity represents the proportion of total assets owed by the organisation to its owners. Total equity makes the accounting equation balance. Equity includes retained earnings which are the residual profits left in the organisation. Other examples of equity are ordinary share capital, retained earnings and other reserves.

When a company like Rozim first comes into existence it issues shares to its owners (the shareholders). Throughout the life of the organisation, shares may be bought and sold, but the organisation will not benefit from shares being bought or sold unless they are issuing them. This is known as the secondary market.

Ordinary share capital represents the sum of money raised by an organisation through the issue of ordinary shares, and therefore is ‘contributed equity’, provided by shareholders. The amount in ordinary share capital is the number of shares times by the ‘nominal value’ as set by the organisation.

Share premium represents the excess which shares have been sold at above their ‘nominal value’.

Retained earnings is ‘generated equity’: equity that is generated from accumulated profits over time. Retained earnings represent the funds out of which dividends might be paid if the directors think it appropriate to do so. This can be shown as:

\[\begin{align} &\text{Retained earnings for the end of the current period (SoFP date)}\\ &= \text{Retained earnings brought forward (from previous period)}\\ &+ \text{Net profit (from income statement P&L)}\\ &- \text{Dividends} \end{align}\]

Pause to reflect

  • Consider the information a SoFP gives you and reflect on how useful it is for different users of the accounts.
  • How could the SoFP be rearranged to be more useful to others? Does it make sense to separate equity and liabilities? Should a more prominent split be made between current and non-current? Or should there be another categorisation?

Question 7.5

Which of the following correctly describes the SoFP?

  • The SoFP shows the cash receipts and payments over a period of time.
  • The SoFP shows the assets and liabilities of a company at a point in time.
  • The SoFP shows the financial performance of a company over a period of time.
  • Cash receipts and payments are shown in the cash flow statement.
  • The SoFP shows an entity’s assets, liabilities and equity at a point in time, the last day of the accounting period.
  • The performance over a period of time is shown in the income statement.

The income statement

Consider the income statement (IS), which is where an organisation shows their financial performance over an accounting period. For Rozim, this is the profit made in the year to 30 September 2035. It is also known as a profit and loss statement, however this does not reflect the increasing numbers of organisations who do not focus on profit as a main aim and thus we will use the term income statement.

The IS presents financial performance by measuring income and expenses for an accounting period.

In accounting, negative numbers are shown in brackets, so (loss) means the same as a negative profit; that is, expenses are greater than income for the period.

Income and expenses are the final two fundamental financial elements and are related as follows:

\[\text{Income − Expenses = Profit or (Loss)}\]

Notice that the IS presents income and expenses for an accounting period, yet the SoFP presents assets, liabilities and equity at a point in time, the end of that accounting period. This is visualised in Figure 7.2.

The diagram shows an arrow from left to right, depicting the length of the accounting period. At the furthermost left-hand side of this arrow (the start) is a picture of a camera and the words ‘statement of financial position (SoFP) at the beginning of the period’. At the further most right-hand side of the arrow (the end) is a picture of a camera and the words ‘statement of financial position (SoFP) at the end of the period’. Between these two images is a picture of a projector with a ‘play’ symbol on it, and the words ‘Income and expenses during the period shown in the income statement (IS)’.

Figure 7.2 Timeline of accounting period, including relative positions of SoFP and IS.

Pause to reflect

Review the Rozim IS. What is the story of the company for the year from 1 October 2034 to 30 September 2035?

  • Are they profitable?
  • Are their sales increasing or decreasing from year to year? What about the expenses? And how has this impacted profit?

Revenue and income are terms that are often used interchangeably in the UK, although this is not always the case. For our purposes, revenue represents the income generated from the sale of goods and services it is also sometimes known as turnover.

Revenue

Revenue is not a verb, but it can be helpful to think of it as one because it reminds us that it derives from an activity that results in the generation of value. For Rozim, revenue comes from the activity of selling clothing. Selling clothes generates cash for the company; the cash is the asset, and the selling of clothing is the revenue source. For other organisations, revenue could derive from the activity of providing a service to customers or the income from donations or grants. Revenue is measured by determining the economic value that the activity will generate, regardless of when the cash is paid.

Pause to reflect

  • Find the revenue total for Rozim of £4,188,373. Where is it in the IS?
  • Can you work out how much net profit was generated by Rozim for every pound of revenue received in 2035? And 2034? Is it increasing or decreasing? This is the net profit margin.

Revenue cannot be recognised until the risks and rewards of providing the goods or services are transferred to the customer. Given the judgement involved in ascertaining whether this has happened, every set of accounts will have a policy for revenue recognition, which sets out when the revenue can be recognised. For example, for an airline like EasyJet, revenue is not recognised until the plane takes off, even though customers have paid in advance for their ticket. Review the revenue recognition policy in their latest financial statements.

Pause to reflect

  • Look up the revenue recognition policy in Rozim Fashion Limited, and in the accounts of an organisation you buy goods or services from.
  • Does it seem reasonable to you? Does it explain in understandable terms when the risks and rewards are transferred?

If cash is received before revenue can be recognised, it will be a liability on the SoFP called deferred income, as there will be an obligation to pay it back if the sale does not take place. If cash is received afterwards, it will be an asset called accrued income. This can be complex, for example, in relation to construction. See for example, Barratt Homes’s revenue recognition policy.

Question 7.6

When can revenue be recognised by an organisation?

  • When the cash has been received by the organisation.
  • When the inventory leaves the organisation.
  • When the risks and rewards are transferred to the buyer.
  • When the sale is discussed with the buyer.
  • Revenue can be recognised before or after cash has been received.
  • The inventory leaving the organisation does not necessarily mean that revenue can be recognised.
  • Revenue is recognised when the risk and rewards are transferred to the buyer.
  • Discussing a sale does not mean the revenue will be recognised.

Expenses

Expenses can be thought of as the result of activities that consume value. Organisations have many different types of expenses, including when inventory is sold, electricity is consumed, vehicles are driven and employees are paid. Proper recording of expenses often requires considerable estimates to be made because organisations need to recognise the expenses attributable to the period and to match these to the revenue recognised. Some such matches are straightforward to record (for example, the expense of most staff salaries), while others are more inherently uncertain (for example, recording the expense of an ongoing legal claim).

Like revenue, expenses are recognised when the activity takes place. It doesn’t matter if cash is paid before, at the same time as, or after the activity. It is the activity that determines when expenses are recognised.

Expenses are categorised to allow for more detailed subtotals of profit: gross profit, operating profit, profit before tax and profit for the year. See this guidance to help you identify items in the IS.

The net profit for the year (sometimes known as a surplus in not-for-profit organisations) represents the net increase in the asset value of the organisation in the accounting period when all expenses have been deducted from all income. This net profit (or surplus) is included in the retained earnings within equity in the SoFP. This is because in the company law of most jurisdictions, retained profits can be used to permit the payment of dividends to shareholders. A profit would increase the overall potential obligation from the organisation to the shareholder and a loss would reduce it. Retained earnings represent the organisation’s potential obligation to its owners in relation to the organisation’s accumulated profits less any dividends which have been paid out to shareholders as distributed profit.

The connection between the SoFP and IS is that net profit is added to the brought forward retained earnings and a net loss is deducted from brought forward retained earnings, which is part of equity. This figure then becomes the balancing figure in the movement in the value of the SoFP for a period.

Pause to reflect

  • Try to trace through the net profit of £199,437 to the change in retained earnings from 2034 to 2035 in Rozim Fashion.
  • Consider the information an IS gives you and its focus on shareholder gains. Reflect on how useful it is for other users of the accounts.

Question 7.7

Which of the following correctly describes the income statement (IS)?

  • The IS shows the assets and liabilities at a point in time.
  • The IS shows the cash receipts and payments over a period of time.
  • The IS shows the financial performance over a period of time.
  • The IS shows the financial performance at a point in time.
  • Not correct. The assets and liabilities are shown on the SoFP.
  • It is not correct that cash receipts and payments are shown on the cash flow statement.
  • Correct. The IS shows an entity’s income and expenses over a period of time, usually a year.
  • Not correct. The IS shows an entity’s income and expenses over a period of time, usually a year, rather than at a point in time.

Alternative presentations

The presentation of the IS in the Rozim Fashion statements and in the statements of organisations reporting under IFRS is not the only way of showing this information and the rules as to how it must be presented can change over time. For example, for annual reports beginning on or after 1 January 2027, the categories in the IS will be investing, financing, income tax, discontinued operations and operating. The aim of creating organisations is to generate wealth, and the value added income statement shows how that wealth has been distributed. Consider the presentation suggested by Quattrone (2021) as applied to the case study company Rozim shown in Figure 7.3.

Value added income statement
Revenues 4,188,373
Cost of production and services (3,664,800)
Value added by operating activities 101,686
Interest received 0
Dividends received 0
Wealth created 625,259
Distributed as follows:
Employees 377,210
Providers of interest-bearing capital 365
State 48,247
Firm 199,437
Shareholders 0
Wealth distributed 625,259

Figure 7.3 Alternative value added income statement.

Quattrone (2021) also considered the idea of adding nature as another category to which wealth could be distributed. So, for Rozim, any donations or activities which benefit nature could be added to an additional line in the ‘wealth distributed’ section.

Pause to reflect

  • Consider Quattrone’s layout of the IS versus the one you see in Rozim Fashion. Which is more useful to different users, such as employees, community groups, lenders, and why?
  • How else could this information be presented? How might this change the story for interested parties?

We have seen that organisations recognise assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses in their financial statements, with a clear understanding of what these financial elements represent and in which specific statement they are placed. However, we need to more closely consider how these elements are measured.

7.4 Judgements and estimates

Financial statements are prepared using various measurement bases to ensure the information presented is relevant, reliable and comparable. Historical cost records items at their original purchase price, which is reliable but might not reflect their current worth. Alternatively, for some transactions, current entry value or market value is used to measure assets and liabilities:

  • Current entry value is the cost to purchase the asset.
  • Market value (current exit value), on the other hand, uses the current market price or estimated value, providing a more accurate picture of the company’s financial health. However, it can be less reliable due to potential estimation errors. It also assumes that the asset will be sold at the time it is revalued, which is not the case.

Different approaches to measurement can lead to different impacts in the accounts, for example, different approaches to valuation of non-current assets and inventory. The approach an organisation may take will depend on its perspective and the prevailing accounting standards in their industry.

Measuring non-current assets

Non-current assets (NCAs) can stay on the SoFP for many years and represent long-term resources owned by a company that are not intended for sale in the normal course of the organisation’s operations. The transaction amounts which are allocated to NCAs are known as ‘capital costs’. If a cost is capitalised it will be recorded on the balance sheet within assets, under NCA. If a cost is not capitalised, it is often ‘expensed’. This means that it will reduce profit and be recorded on the income statement. Organisations that want to maximise profit might be tempted to capitalise expenses so that they are on the SoFP and so not included as expenses in the income statement.

Pause to reflect

WorldCom is an example of a company that falsely recognised assets when the company was incurring expenses. They also inflated revenues and in the investigation in 2002 it was found that the financial accounts had fraudulently been inflated by $3.8 billion. In this case the CEO, Bernie Ebbers, was found to be liable and served 13 years in prison for fraud and filing false documents. You can read more about the case here.

  • WorldCom management illegally inflated profits, particularly by capitalising costs. How can we ensure organisations are not able to use the subjectivity in accounting standards to commit fraud in the future?

Non-current asset measurement

As a result of applying the adjusted historical cost measurement base, non-current assets are recorded at their carrying value (also sometimes called the net book value) which is calculated as follows:

\[\text{Carrying value = Initial cost − Depreciation or amortisation expenses charged to date}\]

The following discussion explains the judgement involved in estimating the initial costs and the depreciation or amortisation expense.

Estimating the initial cost

The initial costs which are classed as assets have to meet the criteria listed in Figure 7.4 to show that they relate to long-term resources owned by the organisation.

Three tick boxes are shown for the three criteria: Separately identifiable, control (power to obtain benefit from the asset), future economic benefit (such as revenues or reduced future costs).

Figure 7.4 Checklist for recognising a non-current asset on the SoFP, see IAS 38 for more details.

Question 7.8

Which of the following potential assets satisfy the criteria of recognising an intangible asset in the SoFP?

  • software
  • patents and trademarks
  • research and development costs
  • knowledge
  • brands
  • customer database
  • employees
  • Yes, software which has been purchased can be separately identified, the organisation is likely to have control over it, and there will be future benefits which are measurable so it should be recognised as an intangible asset.
  • Yes, patents and trademarks which have been purchased can be separately identified, the organisation is likely to have control over it, and there will be future benefits which are measurable so it should be recognised as an intangible asset.
  • No, not all research and development can be capitalised. While it might be separately identified and the organisation is likely to have control over it, it is not always true that there will be future benefits which are measurable. Once future benefits are measurable (known as development rather than research costs) then costs can be capitalised as intangible.
  • No, knowledge is not usually included as an intangible asset. It can’t usually be separately identified and it is questionable that the organisation has control over knowledge and that future benefits can be measured.
  • Yes, brands which have been purchased can be separately identified, the organisation is likely to have control over them, and there will be future benefits which are measurable so they should be recognised as intangible assets. Internally generated brands cannot be capitalised; only those which have been bought are separately identifiable.
  • Yes, customer databases which have been purchased can be separately identified, the organisation is likely to have control over them, and there will be future benefits which are measurable so they should be recognised as intangible assets. Internally generated customer databases cannot be capitalised; only those which have been bought are separately identifiable.
  • No, employees are not usually included as an intangible asset, as they can’t usually be separately identified and it is questionable that the organisation has control over employees and that future benefits can be measured – aside from professional sports players who can be bought by a club such as footballers, see reflection below.

Pause to reflect

One exception to employees being included as intangible assets is the case of professional footballers who are bought and sold between football clubs. Their contracts can be included as intangible assets when they have been purchased separately, the organisation is likely to have control over them, and are expected to be future benefits which are measurable. You can find details in the Barcelona FC financial statements.

  • If this is the case, do you think other key employees should be included as intangible assets?
  • Or should other intangible assets be included to reflect the modern nature of businesses?

For tangible assets, the amount which can be included as a non-current asset is the purchase price, or costs of constructing the asset, plus any costs necessary to bring the asset into its intended use in its intended location. This includes delivery and installation costs.

When alternations are made to tangible assets, these costs can be capitalised if they are improving a tangible asset, for example extending its useful life or increasing its operating capacity, but not if the costs are for repairing it. This also brings with it judgement on what is an improvement and thus can be capitalised and what is a repair which cannot be capitalised and must be an expense (therefore reducing profit).

Question 7.9

Which of the following can be classified as tangible assets?

  • buying a building
  • buying inventory
  • paying a transport company for delivering a fixed asset
  • paying the wages of employees installing the fixed asset and making it ready to be used
  • buying materials to repair the warehouse
  • extending the warehouse to include a lorry port
  • Yes, a building would be classed as a tangible asset.
  • No, inventory are items bought to be sold and so cannot be capitalised as tangible assets.
  • Yes, all costs ‘necessary to bring the asset into its intended use in its intended location’ can be capitalised and this includes transportation costs.
  • Yes, probably if they can be separately identified, because all costs ‘necessary to bring the asset into its intended use in its intended location’ can be capitalised and this can includes employee costs.
  • No, materials for repair would not be seen as an improvement as so it cannot be capitalised.
  • Yes, extending the warehouse to include a lorry port is likely to be an improvement and so can be capitalised.

Pause to reflect

  • What limitations do you think are associated with the approach of capitalising all costs necessary to bring the asset to its intended use in its intended location?
  • What costs would you capitalise if you were being as transparent and ethical as possible?

Estimating the amortisation or depreciation

Another estimation involved in measuring non-current assets is the amortisation (for intangible assets) or depreciation (for tangible assets) expense. This expense reduces the value of the asset (on the SoFP) and is an expense which reduces the profit of the organisation. It does not involve cash.

Financial analysts typically focus on operating earnings after adding back depreciation and amortisation. This ensures that they are focused on the operational performance excluding the impact of accounting choices related to non-current assets. However, it should also be recognised that non-current assets underpin the operational capacity of organisations. In the future it is likely that this number will be on the financial statements when a new accounting standard (IFRS 18) comes into force, but before this comes into place it can be calculated using the published numbers.

Recording depreciation or amortisation expenses is a way of spreading the expense of a non-current asset over its useful economic life. This means that instead of recognising the entire cost of a non-current asset as an expense in the year it is purchased, the cost is spread out over several years. It matches the expense of the non-current asset to the revenue that the asset helps to earn. The way depreciation (or amortisation) is calculated requires an estimation to be made of the useful economic life of the non-current asset and the residual or scrap value. Further, several methods can used to calculate depreciation or amortisation, with organisations expected to select an approach that reflects the usage of the asset over time.

Straight-line depreciation/amortisation
\[\text{Depreciation or Amorisation expense = } \frac{\text{Cost of the NCA − Residual value}}{\text{Useful economic life}}\]

Question 7.10

Calculate the yearly amortisation expense on a straight-line basis for a new trademark bought by Rozim for £15,000, which has zero residual value and an estimated useful economic life of 10 years.

  • 15,000
  • 1,500
  • 1,000
  • Try again. £15,000 is the full cost of the asset.
  • Yes, this is the cost of £15,000 minus 0 residual value. This number is then divided by 10 years, giving £1,500.
  • Try again. This is the expense if the useful economic life was 15 years.

Question 7.11

Calculate the yearly amortisation expense for a new trademark bought by Rozim for £15,000, which has £5,000 residual value and an estimated useful economic life of 50 years.

  • 15,000
  • 1,500
  • 300
  • 200
  • Try again. £15,000 is the full cost of the asset.
  • No, this is the amortisation expense for 0 residual value spread over 10 years.
  • Try again. Be sure to take off the residual value of £5,000 before spreading over 50 years.
  • Yes, well done. This is £15,000 – £5,000 = £10,000 This expense is spread over 50 years: £10,000/50 = £200.

Pause to reflect

The estimations involved in useful economic lives and residual values can be used to manipulate the profits of an organisation. Organisations can change their estimations of useful economic lives and residual values and this is one way the company Waste Management committed fraud in the early 1990s, which you can see from legal documents.

  • Should organisations be able to change their estimates?
Reducing balance depreciation/amortisation
\[\text{Depreciation or Amortisation expense = } \text{Carrying value}\ x\ \left(1 - \sqrt[{Years}]{\frac{\text{Residual value}}{\text{Cost of the NCA}}} \right)\]

For example, if one of Rozim’s NCAs, say a vehicle for one of their sales reps, was recorded at an initial cost of £20,000, had a useful economic value of 4 years and a residual value of £512, the depreciation (comparing the two methods) and NBV is shown in Figure 7.5.

Year Straight-line
– expense each year
Reducing balance
– expense each year
Straight-line
carrying value
Reducing balance
carrying value
Year 1 4,872 12,000 15,128 8,000
Year 2 4,872 4,800 10,256 3,200
Year 3 4,872 1,920 5,384 1,280
Year 4 4,872 768 512 512

Figure 7.5 Table of expenses for Rozim non-current assets using different methods of depreciation.

It is clear from these calculations that at the end of the useful economic life, the total expense is the same for both methods, but how this is spread changes when using straight-line compared to reducing balance methods. It can be shown graphically in Figure 7.6.

The graph shows four lines on it, two showing the expense for each method and two showing the net book value. For the straight line expense the blue line shows that it is the same for each of the four years at £4,872. For the reducing balance expense a red line shows a decrease in the expense from £12,000 down to £768 in year 4. For straight line net book value, the yellow line shows that value of the asset reduces by the same amount each year to a final residual value of £512. For reducing balance a green line shows the net book value reduces the net book value more in the earlier years down to the same final residual value of £512 at the end of four years.

Figure 7.6 Graph showing the depreciation expense and carrying value for Rozim’s non-current assets using different methods of depreciation.

When NCAs are sold

When NCAs are sold or disposed of for proceeds, the carrying value is used to calculate the profit or loss on disposal, which will be recorded in the income statement.

\[\text{Profit (or loss) on disposal = Proceeds − Carrying value at date of disposal}\]

Thus, the carrying value can have a significant effect on whether profits or losses are shown at the time of disposing of non-current assets.

Question 7.12

If Rozim sells the vehicle in the example above at the end of year 3 for £4,000 proceeds, what will be the profit or loss on disposal – using the straight-line method – when the carrying value at this date was £5,384?

  • profit of £1,384
  • loss of £1,384
  • profit of £2,720
  • loss of £2,720
  • Good try, but this will be a loss not a profit. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £5,384 carrying value, which is minus £1,384.
  • Yes, this is right. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £5,384 carrying value.
  • Try again. This is the profit on disposal for the reducing balance method. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £1,280 carrying value, which is a profit of £1,384.
  • Try again. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £5,384 carrying value, which is a £1,384 loss.

Question 7.13

If Rozim sell the vehicle in the example above at the end of year 3 for £4,000 proceeds, what will be the profit or loss on disposal – using the reducing balance method – when the carrying value at this date was £1,280?

  • profit of £1,384
  • loss of £1,384
  • profit of £2,720
  • loss of £2,720
  • Try again. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £1,280 carrying value, which is a profit of £2,720.
  • Try again. This is the loss under the straight-line method. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £1,280 carrying value, which is a profit of £2,720.
  • Yes, this is right. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £1,280 carrying value, which is a profit of £2,720.
  • Good try, but this scenario will show a profit. The calculation would be £4,000 proceeds minus £1,280 carrying value, which is a profit of £2,720.

Pause to reflect

The choice of methods here has an effect on the profit even when the useful economic life and residual values are unchanged.

  • Should there be a choice of methods?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of choice?

Reducing the value of an asset through impairment

The value of NCAs can also be reduced through an impairment. This is when the asset is no longer worth its value on the SoFP. There are many factors which may indicate that an asset is impaired, such as a decline in the market value, changes in the economy, or laws which might change the value of the asset. For non-current assets the asset’s fair value is compared to its carrying value. Calculating the fair value can involve significant estimation where an open market price is not easily identified. In these situations, experts are often engaged to provide valuations. If the fair value is less, the asset is impaired, and an impairment will be recorded as an expense in the income statement.

\[\text{Impairment expense = Fair value of NCA − Carrying value of NCA}\]

The expense will reduce the profit of the organisation.

Increasing the value of an asset through revaluation

If it is believed the value of NCAs is higher than its carrying value, organisations can choose to revalue it, which may show a more relevant amount for the users of financial statements.

\[\text{Revaluation amount = Carrying value of NCA − Fair value of NCA}\]

In this case the NCA value will increase by the revaluation amount but the increase cannot be recorded in the income statement until the asset is actually sold. The increase will be recorded in a separate equity account called a revaluation surplus.

This example shows the nature of accounting which does not allow profits to be recognised simply because assets have increased in value; they can only be recognised when items have been sold. This leads to an apparent mismatch in IS accounting treatment between impairments and revaluations: while both are recognised as adjustments to non-current assets on the SoFP, only impairments affect the profit in the IS.

Details of non-current assets are shown as notes to the accounts. Look at Notes 4 and 5 in the Rozim Fashion Limited statements to investigate their non-current assets. Look at the ‘additions’, which are the newly purchased assets, the disposals (discussed above), the depreciation or amortisation expense, as well as the calculation of carrying value and the revaluation equity balance.

Measuring current assets

Current assets are those assets owned by an organisation which are expected to be turned into cash within 12 months. However, measuring current assets in particular inventory and trade receivables involves significant choice, estimation and judgement.

Inventory

Inventory can include raw materials, work in progress, and finished goods held for sale. They are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.

To calculate the cost, raw materials are measured at the value they were bought for. Finished goods are measured by the raw materials costs plus allocated direct costs. Determining the cost, especially when costs may fluctuate, and which direct costs to allocate rather than record as an expense, involves judgement. Work in progress include the raw materials and allocated direct costs multiplied by the percentage of completion, which is, of course, judgement.

To calculate the net realisable value for each item of inventory, the following calculation is used:

\[\text{Net realisable value = Selling price − Costs incurred to sell the item}\]

This approach ensures that damaged or unsellable inventory is not overstated in value.

Most inventory items are measured at cost, and usually the net realisable value will be higher than this. However, finished goods which are being sold at a loss will need to be adjusted. The organisation must reduce the value of these current assets down from the cost of finished goods (including any allocated direct costs) to the selling price less any costs incurred to sell the item, which is likely to involve significant estimation. This reduction in value will be an expense, reducing the profit of the organisation.

Question 7.14

Rozim has dresses held in finished goods as follows:

Item Number in inventory Cost value Selling price Costs to sell
Red dress 10 £15 £20 £1
Blue dress 20 £15 £15 £1
Purple dress 20 £15 £25 £1

What is the value of these finished goods in inventory?

  • 730
  • 750
  • 950
  • Yes. The value in inventory is £730. The red dresses at cost (10 × £15 = £150), the blue dresses at net realisable value (20 × £14 = £280), and the purple dresses at cost (20 × £15 = £300)
  • Try again. This answer just used the cost value but the net realisable value of the blue dresses is lower.
  • Try again. This answer just the net realisable value; the cost value of the red and purple dresses is lower.

Considering that organisations might be purchasing large amounts of inventory at prices which could change over time, how do they work out which cost to allocate to individual inventory items? There are number of different methods they can choose from. Three of these are weighted average cost (WAC), first in, first out (FIFO) and last in, first out (LIFO).

Weighted average cost reflects a blend of costs and is relatively simple to calculate. It is calculated by

\[\text{WAC = } \frac{\text{Quantity}\ x\ \text{cost1} + \text{Quantity}\ x\ \text{cost2} + \text{Quantity}\ x\ \text{cost3}\ldots}{\text{Total quantity}}\]

It is used when items in inventory can’t be differentiated between, but prices may vary, for example, oil, copper or sand.

Question 7.15

Rozim bought 60 batches of cloth at the following costs during the year. If there at 40 batches left in inventory at the year end, what is the weighted average cost?

Number Cost
10 £5
20 £6
30 £7
  • £240
  • £253
  • £270
  • Try again. This was calculated using the LIFO method, so the last 20 would have been deemed sold first and the first 40 bought, which are still in inventory, would be 10 at £5, plus 20 at £6 plus 10 at £7 = £240.
  • Well done! The weighted average cost is ((10 × 5) + (20 × 6) + (30 × 7))/60 = (50 + 120 + 210)/60 = £6.33 per batch. For the 40 left in inventory at the year end, the weighted average cost will be 7.60 × 40 = £253.
  • Try again. This was calculated using the FIFO method, so the first 20 would have been sold first and the last 40 bought would be 10 at £6 plus 30 at £7 = £270.

In the FIFO method, the first items in inventory are assumed to be used up first. This means that the costs of items will be much closer to the recent purchase costs.

Question 7.16

Rozim bought 60 batches of cloth at the following costs during the year. If there at 40 batches left in inventory at the year end what is the FIFO cost?

Number Cost
10 £5
20 £6
30 £7
  • £240
  • £253
  • £270
  • Try again. This was calculated using the LIFO method, so the last 20 would have been deemed sold first and the first 40 bought, which are still in inventory, would be 10 at £5, plus 20 at £6 plus 10 at £7 = £240.
  • Try again. This was calculated using the weighted average cost method, which is ((10 × 5) + (20 × 6) + (30 × 7))/60 = (50 + 120 + 210)/60 = £6.33 per batch. For the 40 left in inventory at the year end the weighted average cost will be 7.60 × 40= £253.
  • Well done! This was calculated using the FIFO method, so the first 20 would have been sold first and the last 40 bought would be 10 at £6 plus 30 at £7 = £270.

Finally, the LIFO method assumes that the items last bought are the first to be sold and might be appropriate for fast-moving inventory or inflationary environments.

Question 7.17

Rozim bought 60 batches of cloth at the following costs during the year. If there at 40 batches left in inventory at the year end what is the FIFO cost?

Number Cost
10 £5
20 £6
30 £7
  • £240
  • £253
  • £270
  • Well done. This was calculated using the LIFO method, so the last 20 would have been deemed sold first and the first 40 bought, which are still in inventory, would be 10 at £5, plus 20 at £6 plus 10 at £7 = £240.
  • Try again, this was calculated using the weighted average cost which is ((10 × 5) + (20 × 6) + (30 × 7))/60 total = (50 + 120 + 210)/60 = £6.33 per batch. For the 40 left in inventory at the year end the weighted average cost will be 7.60 x 40= £253.
  • Try again, this was calculated using the FIFO method, so the first 20 would have been sold first and the last 40 bought would be 10 at £6 plus 30 at £7 = £270.

Pause to reflect

The LIFO method is no longer permitted under IFRS as it was no longer deemed to show a true and fair view of the value of an organisation’s inventory as generally prices rise. Assuming the last items of inventory in are the first out means that the inventory value reflects a much lower cost than reality. In the US, it is still sometimes permitted.

  • What are the benefits of and concerns about allowing different inventory methods in different locations?

Trade receivables

Trade receivables include any amounts owing to organisations by their customers. To measure trade receivables, companies first identify the total amount of money owed to them by customers as of the year-end date. They then subtract any amounts that they will not receive (known as bad debts), and an estimated amount for debts that they believe may not be collected from those customers (doubtful debts). This is called a credit loss, sometimes known as a bad and doubtful debt expense.

Provisions for doubtful debts reflect a degree of estimation, informed by prior experience. For example, receivables over 90 days may be fully provided for, and those between 60 and 90 days provided for at the rate of 10% and those below 60 days not provided for. The provision for doubtful debts is shown as a reduction of trade receivables in the SoFP and is typically adjusted up or down via the IS each year.

Question 7.18

Rozim has recorded a sale of £71,010 to one customer, Old Look, and £26,598 to another customer, G&N. Old Look has just gone into administration and Rozim are unlikely to receive any cash from them. They think they will receive the full amount from G&N.

What should they record as the value of their revenue (in the income statement) and receivables (in the statement of financial position) for these two customers?

  • revenue £97,608, receivables £97,608
  • revenue £97,608, receivables £71,010
  • revenue £97,608, receivables £26,598
  • revenue £71,010, receivables £71,010
  • revenue £26,598, receivables £26,598
  • Try again. Although this revenue figure is correct, the receivables presented on the SoFP should only include those which are likely to be paid to Rozim, thus the Old Look debt should be excluded.
  • Try again. Although this revenue figure is correct ,the receivables presented on the SoFP should only include those which are likely to be paid to Rozim, thus the Old Look debt should be excluded.
  • Well done. The revenue would be the full amount from both customers as these sales were made, but only recoverable receivables will be presented on the SoFP. The £71,010 would be included as a bad debt expense on the income statement.
  • Try again. The revenue would be the full amount from both customers as these sales were made, but only recoverable receivables will be presented on the SoFP.
  • Try again. The revenue would be the full amount from both customers as these sales were made, but only recoverable receivables will be presented on the SoFP.

Pause to reflect

Look at Rozim’s SoFP Note 1 and find out their policies for measuring inventory and receivables.

  • Are there other, more transparent ways this can be measured?
  • For Rozim is it true that inventory should be measured on the weighted average cost?
  • Is it fair to include revenue for debts for customers who have not paid?

Measuring liabilities

Measuring current liabilities also involves significant judgement and estimation about when, how and at what value they should be recorded. For example, an organisation might have unpaid rent for the period or are likely to have to pay out because they are being sued. Financial statements must contain a complete summation of all liabilities that the organisation is obligated to pay.

Non-current liabilities are due to be settled in over a year’s time. Some of these are subject to clear documentation, such as loans, while others require estimation like provisions. Provisions are liabilities for uncertain events, such as legal cases (being sued) or other future probable obligations (such as product warranties). If a future event is likely to result in an outflow of cash, a provision must be recorded in the current year, as soon as it becomes probable. However, if it is not probable (generally accepted as less than a 50% likelihood) it will not be recorded as a provision liability. The decision regarding when an outflow of cash is deemed probable is significant and will influence the profit of an organisation! It is often the case that external expert opinions help to inform the accounting, for example, legal opinions on court cases.

Question 7.19

Rozim have been made aware of two legal claims at the year end:

  1. They are being sued by a designer label, DAP, for copying designer suits which were protected under copyright. Rozim’s lawyers think it is likely they will need to pay £200,000 to DAP if this goes to court.
  2. A former employee is bringing a claim for unfair dismissal to Rozim. Rozim’s lawyers think there is a 20% chance that £50,000 will need to be paid out.

What should the provision be in Rozim’s financial accounts?

  • 250,000
  • 210,000
  • 200,000
  • 0
  • Try again. Being sued by DAP is likely to result in an outflow of cash of £200,000 therefore this should be included as a provision. However, the unfair dismissal claim is unlikely to result in an outflow of cash (less than 50% probability) and so no provision is needed for this.
  • Try again. Being sued by DAP is likely to result in an outflow of cash of £200,000 therefore this should be included as a provision. However, the unfair dismissal claim is unlikely to result in an outflow of cash (less than 50% probability) and so no provision is needed for this.
  • Well done. Being sued by DAP is likely to result in an outflow of cash of £200,000 therefore this should be included as a provision, and the unfair dismissal claim is unlikely to result in an outflow of cash (less than 50% probability) and so no provision is needed for this.
  • Try again. Being sued by DAP is likely to result in an outflow of cash of £200,000 therefore this should be included as a provision.

Pause to reflect

By 2007, Lehman Brothers repeatedly used an interpretation of a US accounting standard (SFAS140) called Repo 105 to record short-term loans made under a repurchase agreement as sales. They received cash for these loans and recorded sales of $50 billion, which were, in substance, loans. In 2008 they filed for bankruptcy. At this time, they were one of the four largest investment banks in the US and had 25,000 employees worldwide. The collapse of Lehman Brothers is thought to have triggered the 2007–2008 financial crisis.

What Lehman Brothers management did was not illegal, nor against accounting standards at the time but it did prioritise short-term gains over long-term stability and ethical business practices.

  • How can we ensure that accounting standards promote transparency and accurate financial reporting to prevent similar situations in the future?

Measuring equity

The contents of the equity for an organisation will very much depend on the type of organisation it is. Most will have a version of retained earnings (or reserves) but only companies will have shares.

Retained earnings

Retained earnings is one particular category which is derived from the income statement, as it includes profit. It is the residual remaining balance which is owned by the shareholders and is what makes a SoFP balance. Recall that the retained earnings for the end of the current period (SoFP date) includes retained earnings brought forward (from previous periods) plus net profit (Revenue less costs of sales less sales from the Income Statement) minus dividends.

Retained earnings for the end of the current period (SoFP date) equals retained earnings brought forward (from previous period) plus net profit (Revenue less costs of sales less sales from the Income Statement) minus dividends.

Pause to reflect

  • Retained earnings are not normally adjusted for inflation. Should accounts be adjusted for inflation?
  • Often when historical cash amounts are discussed they are adjusted to current value so that they are more relevant to users. By including profits at historical costs are financial accounts less relevant to users?
  • What might be the concerns with adjusting accounts?

The net profit calculation starts with revenue, which is recognised when the risks and rewards of the sale are transferred to the customer, not when the customer pays. Net profit also includes costs of sales, which are affected by the inventory valuation methods. It includes expenses such as depreciation, amortisation, impairments and provisions, which all involve a high degree of estimation and judgement.

Dividends are recognised as liabilities on the date the organisation is obligated to pay them, thus the retained earnings can be manipulated by moving the date of announcement of dividends.

Equity in a non-profit organisations

In non-profit organisations, equity, often referred to as net assets, represents the difference between the organisation’s assets and liabilities. Unlike for-profit businesses, this equity belongs to the organisation itself and is used to further its mission. There are two main categories:

  • unrestricted net assets, which are funds that can be used for any purpose within the organisation’s mission; they are the most flexible type of net assets
  • restricted net assets, which are funds that are permanently restricted by donors for specific purposes or endowments; the organisation cannot use these funds for any other purpose.

It is critical to be clear on whether funds are restricted or not as there can be dire consequences for organisations that inappropriately use restricted funds.

Share capital in companies

Share capital is in companies is relatively easy to measure when shares are sold for cash. However, it becomes much more complex when shares are sold through ‘rights’ or ‘bonus issues’ or offered to directors as part of a share scheme. Within companies the ‘share capital’ category will always show shares at their nominal value with any excess being shown as share premium.

Question 7.20

Rozim receives £125,000 cash for selling 100,000 shares and Rozim’s shares’ nominal value is £1.00. How will this be shown in the equity of Rozim?

  • share capital £125,000
  • share capital £100,000, share premium £25,000
  • share capital £1, share premium £124,999
  • Try again. The share capital account is the number of shares sold times by the nominal value.
  • Well done. The share capital account will have 100,000 shares at £1 and the share premium will have the excess £25,000.
  • Try again. The share capital account is the number of shares sold times by the nominal value.

Sometimes a company might back its own shares; this means it essentially repurchases them from existing shareholders. This reduces the number of shares outstanding in the market and the company will pay out cash to existing shareholders. Fewer shares outstanding can increase the demand for the remaining shares, potentially driving up the share price.

7.5 Summary

  • Financial statements seek to communicate relevant and reliable financial information to interested parties.
  • These statements seek to faithfully represent an organisation’s financial position and performance by recognising and measuring assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenditure.
  • The SoFP and IS are generally prepared under the accruals basis, by which operating income is recognised when earned, and expenditure incurred, regardless of cash movement. This is adjusted for any variations in asset and liabilities on the valuation basis.
  • The SoFP shows assets, liabilities and equity, linked by the accounting equation, on the last day of the accounting period.
  • The IS shows income, expenditure and therefore profit/loss for the accounting period.
  • It is important to consider the accounting policies adopted by an organisation given the range of decisions that an organisation can make about how to account for transactions and assets, for example, inventory valuation, depreciation and revenue recognition. Understanding the five elements of financial statements is the foundation for understanding all of accounting. No matter how complex transactions become, they can always be recorded using just these five elements.
  • Although financial reports run to many hundreds of pages, you can always find your way around them from the principal financial reports: the income statement, the statement of financial position, and the statement of cash flows and follow the note numberings for additional explanations of the balances.
  • Significantly, these foundational principles and statements are universal. So, no matter where you are in the world, financial reports will resemble what you have learned here.

Further reading

A visual book explaining fundamental accounting principles and the financial statements:

Frampton. P. & Robilliard., M. (2020). Joy of Accounting. Accounting Comes Alive Inc.

For more detail on the move towards fair value approaches:

Georgiou, O. (2018). The worth of fair value accounting: Dissonance between users and standard setters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3), 1297–1331.

A research paper drawing on the notion of value added, which proposes a new income statement design recognising nature as a stakeholder:

Quattrone, P. (2022). Seeking transparency makes one blind: How to rethink disclosure, account for nature, and make corporations sustainableAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal35(2), 547-566.

Stories of what can go wrong in the world of investment, audit and financial regulation. Could you have spotted the clues that the companies were heading for a fall?

Steer, T. (2019). The signs were there. Profile Books.

References

  1. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, 2018 

  2. Section 4.25 of the IFRS Conceptual Framework